//
you're reading...
General, India

Aryan Invasion Theory

The Aryan invasion theory is a historical theory first put forth by the German Indologist Friedrich Max Müller and others in the mid nineteenth century in order to provide a historical explanation for the existence of Indo-European languages inI ndia.

The best-known form of the theory was developed by European historians in the late nineteenth century. As expressed, for example, by Charles Morris in his 1888 book “The Aryan Race”, this theory holds that a Caucasian race of nomadic warriors known as the Aryans, originating in the Caucasus mountains in South-Eastern Europe, invaded Northern India and Iran, somewhere between 1800 and 1500 BC. The invaders entered the Indian sub-continent from the mountain passes of theHindu Kush, possibly on horseback, bringing with them the domesticated horse. The theory further proposes that this race displaced or assimilated the indigenous pre-Aryan peoples and that the bulk of these indigenous people moved to the southern reaches of the subcontinent or became the lower castes of post-Vedic society. The Aryans would have brought with them their own Vedic religion, which was codified in the Vedas around 1500 to 1200 BC. Upon arrival inIndia, the Aryans abandoned their nomadic lifestyle and mingled with the native peoples remaining in the north ofIndia. The victory of the Aryans over the native civilization was quick and complete, resulting in the dominance of Aryan culture and language over the northern part of the subcontinent and considerable influence on parts of the south.

The theory was first proposed on linguistic grounds, following the discovery that Sanskrit was related to the principal languages ofEurope(the Indo-European language group). It was assumed thatNorthern India, in which languages derived from Sanskrit were spoken, must have been occupied by migrants speaking Indo-European languages. The dominant languages inSouthern India, known as “Dravidian”, were assumed to have been spoken by pre-Aryan peoples, who had been displaced southward. Hence the Aryans were said to have supplanted the Dravidians in the north of the subcontinent.

Initially Max Müller assumed that the migrants would have been farmers, but later writers envisioned an invasion by nomadic warriors. It was proposed, on the basis of passages in the Rig-Veda and assumptions about surviving racial hierarchies, that these invaders were light-skinned people who had subdued darker aboriginal people and then mixed with them. The theory fit some existing ideas that justified contemporary European colonization. Initially, the aboriginal ‘Dravidian’ occupants ofIndiawere assumed to have been primitive, and the achievements of ancientIndiawere credited to the descendants of the Aryan invaders. In the 1920s, however, the Indus Valley Civilization was discovered. It was obviously advanced for its time, with planned cities, a standardized system of weights and bricks, etc, and it was understood that if the Aryans had invaded, then, regardless of their later achievements, they had in fact overthrown or at least supplanted a civilization more advanced than their own.

The association of Aryans with a physical “race” also has been slowly dropped. Max Müller clarified late in his career that by Aryan, he only meant a group of languages and not a race.

About these ads

About Makwana

A student of Sanatan Vedic Dharma

Discussion

2 thoughts on “Aryan Invasion Theory

  1. Aryan Invasion theory is flawed and was advanced to justify European invasion of India.
    If Aryans came from outside India, their stories would have reflected this. Just as Europeans named new cities in Americas and Australia as New York, New Orleans, New South Wales etc, Aryans would have called places in India after places that were their ancestral lands. This is not so. Their books talk of Sindhu and Sarasvati – so they must have some from this region.

    If they came from borders of Russia, their clothes would reflect this. But they wore clothes appropriate for Indian climate. Even now, Europeans wear suites and ties on formal occasions – totally inappropriate in warmer climates because their ancestors wore such clothes on special occasions. While we wear dhoti and sari – totally suited to hot climate – not cold one.

    Even archeology refutes the invasion theory. There is plenty of evidence that proves that no invasion happened. Instead, the area was abandoned due to drying up of rivers and changing course of remaining rivers. Even satellite images collaborate this.

    Sadly, some people hold on to old theories because they can’t see the wood for the trees.

    Posted by Bhagwat Shah | December 14, 2011, 10:10 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Archives

Blog Stats

  • 87,214 hits
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 229 other followers

%d bloggers like this: